Anterix: America’s Hidden Spectrum Monopoly: The $7 Billion Asset Trading at an 89% Discount

A Note on Track Record

Over the past two years, I have published two investment ideas here that have generated returns exceeding 500% for readers who acted on them. I am sharing Anterix today because I believe this idea has similar potential — a structurally irreplaceable asset trading at a fraction of its demonstrable value at a moment when multiple powerful catalysts are converging.

Investment Summary

Anterix (NASDAQ: ATEX) is one of the most unusual asset stories in the US equity market: a company sitting on a nationwide, legally irreplaceable de facto monopoly on 900 MHz broadband spectrum — a dominant position built over a decade through FCC auctions and private market transactions that its own management now values at $2.5 billion to over $7 billion, yet which trades at a market capitalisation of approximately $758 million at the current share price of $40.

The thesis is straightforward. Anterix is the sole holder of nationwide broadband-capable 900 MHz spectrum in the United States. FCC rules make it legally impossible for any new entrant to replicate this position. Utilities are in the early innings of a once-in-a-generation grid modernisation cycle. On 18 February 2026, the FCC unanimously approved an expansion of the band that nearly doubled capacity.

On 26 February 2026, Qualcomm announced a deepened collaboration with Anterix, bringing industrial-grade 5G chipsets to the platform — a critical step toward availability of 900 MHz connectivity in mass-market mobile devices and a potential gateway to an Apple-like partnership.

On 14 April 2026, Amazon agreed to pay $11.57 billion to acquire Globalstar, demonstrating that the world’s largest technology companies pay extraordinary premiums for irreplaceable licensed spectrum.

Anterix has 12 signed utility customers covering 53 million people, over $400 million in contracted proceeds, and a $3 billion pipeline. A formal Morgan Stanley-led strategic review is ongoing. This article makes the case that investors today are being offered a rare opportunity to buy a scarce spectrum infrastructure asset at a fraction of its demonstrable market value.

Company History: From Pacific DataVision to Spectrum Landlord

Anterix traces its origins to 2014, when the company — then called Pacific DataVision (pdvWireless) — acquired a 6 MHz sliver of 900 MHz spectrum from Sprint for approximately $100 million. The great majority of Anterix’s 900 MHz spectrum had originally been purchased by Nextel through the FCC’s auction process. The founders, Brian McAuley and Morgan O’Brien, were the same team that built Nextel Communications — the company that pioneered push-to-talk Direct Connect and grew to a $36 billion valuation before merging with Sprint in 2005. These were not speculators; they were proven operators who understood how to commercialise licensed wireless infrastructure.

In 2020, the FCC adopted rules creating a 3×3 MHz broadband segment in the 900 MHz band. By 2021, the first licences had been granted, and Anterix had signed its first commercial deal with Ameren. The company rebranded as Anterix in August 2019. In 2024, Scott Lang became President and CEO. By April 2026, Anterix had 10 utility customers, covered 53 million people, and had $400 million in contracted spectrum proceeds.

The Spectrum: Why 900 MHz Is Uniquely Valuable

Not all spectrum is equal. 900 MHz has three exceptional qualities for utility use cases.

Physics. Low-band spectrum travels further and penetrates obstacles far more effectively than higher-frequency bands. A single 900 MHz base station can cover an area that would require four to six CBRS (3.5 GHz) base stations to serve. For utilities operating across thousands of square miles of rural territory, this translates directly into capital savings: fewer towers, less backhaul, lower total cost of ownership.

Technology ecosystem. The band has been standardised within 3GPP, meaning equipment from Ericsson, Nokia and Motorola Solutions is available off the shelf. On 26 February 2026, Anterix announced a deepened collaboration with Qualcomm — the world’s dominant mobile chipset company — to develop industrial-grade IoT chipsets optimised specifically for the 900 MHz platform. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon SDX35-3 and SDX32-3 modems will deliver 4G and 5G cellular connectivity on Anterix’s broadband platform. This partnership is significant beyond utilities: Qualcomm’s chipsets find their way into essentially all premium smartphones, including Apple iPhones. An Anterix-Qualcomm chipset ecosystem is the critical first step toward 900 MHz being available in mainstream consumer handsets, which would transform the addressable market from enterprise-only to consumer-facing. A deal with Apple, while speculative, is the logical next step in this trajectory.

The regulatory moat. The FCC’s rules require holding more than 50% of licensed 900 MHz spectrum in any county to qualify for a broadband licence. Anterix owns approximately 60% of all licensed spectrum in the 900 MHz band — a dominant position built through decades of FCC auctions and private market transactions. As of the 2020 FCC Report and Order, Anterix held licences for over 50% of the licensed channels in more than 3,100 of the 3,233 counties in the United States (excluding Pacific territories) — meaning it was eligible to apply for broadband licences in roughly 96% of US counties. The roughly 120 counties where it does not hold a 50%+ position tend to be very sparsely populated rural areas where the FCC has already licensed relatively little spectrum. A separate category of constraint involves legacy complex systems — operators with 45 or more functionally integrated sites, such as major utilities, railroads and large industrial companies. These operators are exempt from mandatory retuning entirely; before mandatory provisions can even be triggered, Anterix must first reach voluntary agreements covering at least 90% of licensed channels in the broadband segment — and even then, complex systems remain exempt and must be negotiated individually. As of the 2020 FCC Report and Order, Anterix had negotiations with 8 of the 10 largest complex systems operators. The complex systems operate low-data, narrowband systems – they need Anterix’s cooperation to get broadband.

Anterix spent years accumulating this spectrum position before the FCC froze new applications. No competitor can replicate it. The moat is structural, legal, and permanent.

The 18 February 2026 FCC Decision: Broader Than Utilities

On 18 February 2026, the FCC voted unanimously to expand the 900 MHz broadband allocation from 6 MHz to 10 MHz — nearly doubling available capacity in every county. This was the single most important regulatory event in Anterix’s history.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr’s language at the February 18 meeting is worth reading carefully, because it reveals a vision well beyond utility grid management. Carr stated that expanding broadband capabilities in 900 MHz “promises new private wireless deployments across a range of sectors” and that the FCC is “advancing efforts to expand broadband use and create new opportunities for utilities and critical infrastructure providers” in ways that “strengthen the American economy.” Critically, the FCC’s formal order title — “Maximising the Potential of the 900 MHz Band” — signals spectrum policy aimed at broad economic productivity, not narrow utility management. In his January 27, 2026 blog post announcing the vote, Chairman Carr framed the initiative under “Good Governance” as a market-driven approach that “builds on our previous work to realign the band.”

The FCC’s framing of this as an economy-wide broadband initiative — not a niche utility tool — is significant for investors. It implies the regulator sees the 900 MHz band as infrastructure capable of serving broader sectors, including consumer applications in time. When the world’s leading mobile chipset company (Qualcomm) and the world’s leading satellite direct-to-device pioneer (Lynk, via experimental licence) are both integrating with Anterix’s spectrum, the “utility niche” characterisation begins to look too narrow.

Economically, CFO Elena Marquez stated at the April 9, 2026 investor call that the 10 MHz framework increases the company’s spectrum value to approximately $2.5 billion to over $7 billion — up from the $1.5–$4 billion range cited for 6 MHz just months earlier. NorthWestern Energy became the first utility to sign a 10 MHz contract within weeks of the ruling, immediately validating the expanded band in the market.

The Qualcomm Partnership: Opening the Door to Consumer Devices

On 26 February 2026, Anterix announced a deepened collaboration with Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. — a landmark development that has received insufficient investor attention. The partnership involves Qualcomm developing industrial-grade IoT chipsets (Snapdragon SDX35-3 and SDX32-3) specifically optimised for Anterix’s 900 MHz broadband platform, enabling 4G and 5G connectivity on utility private networks.

The strategic implications extend far beyond IoT. Qualcomm is the chipset architecture that powers the vast majority of premium Android smartphones and supplies modem technology that Apple uses in its iPhones. When Qualcomm builds 900 MHz support into its Snapdragon modem family, that capability percolates through the entire consumer device ecosystem. Anterix Chief Technology and Engineering Officer Carlos L’Abbate stated that the partnership gives utilities “a clear, scalable roadmap to 5G — one that delivers immediate operational value while supporting long-term network evolution.”

The implications are profound. If 900 MHz chipsets are embedded in standard consumer phones — the logical trajectory of this Qualcomm partnership — Anterix’s spectrum can support not just utility machines and sensors, but the billions of handsets already in people’s pockets. This transforms the potential customer base from a few hundred regulated utilities to hundreds of millions of individual device users. A commercial agreement with Apple — analogous to the Apple/Globalstar Emergency SOS arrangement that underpinned the Amazon/Globalstar deal — is the speculative but logical next step.

The Amazon/Globalstar Deal: Strategic Buyers Pay Up for Spectrum

On 14 April 2026 — just days before this article was written — Amazon announced it would acquire Globalstar (GSAT) for $11.57 billion in cash and stock at $90 per share, representing a 117% premium over Globalstar’s price from late October 2025. The deal is primarily driven by Globalstar’s globally harmonised spectrum portfolio — L/S-band, Band 53/n53, and C-band optionality — which Amazon will combine with its Amazon Leo satellite broadband system to enable direct-to-device services.

The strategic lesson for Anterix investors is direct: the world’s largest technology companies pay very substantial premiums for irreplaceable licensed spectrum, and they do so when they see the spectrum as a platform for future consumer-facing services. Amazon paid $11.57 billion for spectrum that directly competes with SpaceX’s Starlink, which is itself already building out its spectrum position through the EchoStar acquisitions. Spectrum scarcity at the consumer connectivity layer is now driving some of the largest technology deals in history.

Globalstar’s Q1 2026 revenue was $71.96 million annualised — far lower than Anterix’s $400M+ in contracted proceeds already in hand. Yet Globalstar commanded $11.57 billion. The valuation differential is driven by spectrum type, strategic optionality, and the identity of the buyer. Anterix’s 900 MHz position — nationwide, terrestrial, an irreplaceable spectrum franchise now expandable to 10 MHz — represents a comparable class of strategic scarcity.

Notably, SpaceX had previously explored acquiring Globalstar before Amazon outbid it. That competitive dynamic confirms that multiple of the world’s most powerful companies are actively competing for licensed spectrum platforms. Anterix’s ongoing strategic review with Morgan Stanley is taking place in exactly this environment.

The Lynk Partnership: Opening the Satellite-to-Consumer Frontier

At the April 9, 2026 investor call, Anterix announced a partnership with Lynk Global — a direct-to-device satellite company — to file for an FCC experimental licence to test integration of Lynk’s satellite direct-to-device capabilities with Anterix’s 900 MHz private wireless. The testing covers handsets, computers, edge devices and routers across multiple geographic locations and begins in seven US markets from May 2026.

This is potentially the most transformational development in Anterix’s history, and it is the one most likely to be mispriced by the market. Lynk is a pioneer in satellite direct-to-device connectivity — already the second D2D provider licensed for commercial service in the US after SpaceX, with FCC approval to operate in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. Lynk’s technology allows standard unmodified smartphones to communicate directly with satellites using existing cellular spectrum. In other words, Lynk can turn Anterix’s 900 MHz licences into a platform for delivering satellite connectivity to every mobile phone user in America.

Chief Regulatory Officer Chris Guttman-McCabe said the expanded 900 MHz band creates “broader strategic optionality” for “industrial IoT networks, transportation and logistics hubs, water and wastewater systems, and satellite providers.” Asked whether the satellite work could become a standalone product, he said simply: “stay tuned.” CEO Scott Lang said the company is “leaning in early” to position customers “to take advantage of what’s next.”

The parallel to the Grain Management situation is instructive. Grain Management acquired 800 MHz spectrum from T-Mobile for approximately $2.9 billion, initially targeting utilities — but is now pivoting to satellite D2D operators as well, recognising that low-band spectrum is the strategic infrastructure layer for the next generation of connectivity. Anterix’s 900 MHz is one step higher in frequency than Grain’s 800 MHz, with superior propagation characteristics for both terrestrial and satellite-assisted applications. If Anterix secures FCC approval to enable satellite D2D on its 900 MHz licences, the addressable market shifts from 60 utilities to 300 million American mobile users.

The Customers: America’s Largest Regulated Utilities

Anterix’s 12 signed customers as of April 2026 are all investment-grade, regulated US utilities whose spectrum purchases are effectively cost-recoverable through state utility commission rate bases:

  • Ameren (MO & IL) — December 2020; $48M; 7.5M people; 30-yr lease
  • San Diego Gas & Electric (CA) — February 2021; $50M; 3.6M people; $2.31/MHz-POP
  • Evergy (KS & MO) — September 2021; $30.2M; 3.88M people; “fair market value”
  • Xcel Energy (8 states) — October 2022; $80M; ~11M people; 20-yr lease
  • Oncor Electric Delivery (TX, 95 counties) — June 2024; $102.5M; 13M people
  • LCRA (TX) — original 2023, expanded January 2025; $13.5M add-on
  • CPS Energy (San Antonio, TX) — January 2026; $13M; nation’s largest community-owned utility
  • Texas-New Mexico Power (TNMP) — March 2026; subsidiary of TXNM Energy
  • NorthWestern Energy (MT, SD, WY) — March 2026; $7.7M; first 10 MHz deployment
  • One additional undisclosed customer

Together these customers collectively serve tens of millions of people across multiple states — and the addition of Benton PUD, a publicly owned utility (PUD), marks the first time Anterix has signed a non-investor-owned utility, opening an entirely new category of potential customers.

Current Monetisation and Financial Position

Anterix generates revenue through two models: long-term spectrum leases, where Anterix retains the licence, and the utility pays for the right to use it, and outright spectrum sales, where the licence transfers permanently to the utility. Both structures generate large upfront cash payments. Understanding why utilities increasingly prefer outright purchases over leases is essential to grasping the commercial dynamics of this business, and reveals a structural incentive that is highly favourable to Anterix.

Utilities in the United States are regulated entities whose financial returns are governed by state public utility commissions. The fundamental principle of utility regulation is straightforward: a utility earns a regulated rate of return on the capital it invests in infrastructure — its rate base. When a utility buys an asset outright, that asset enters the rate base and generates a perpetual, commission-approved return on investment. When a utility leases an asset instead, the lease payments are treated as an operating expense and do not contribute to the rate base at all. This distinction is financially material. A utility that purchases 900 MHz spectrum licences is making a capital investment that earns regulated returns for decades. The spectrum becomes a productive infrastructure asset on the utility’s balance sheet — earning the same regulated return as a substation or a transmission line — with ratepayers bearing the cost and the commission approving the expenditure as prudent infrastructure investment. This is precisely why utilities such as SDG&E, Oncor, LCRA and CPS Energy have chosen outright purchase over leasing: not simply because they prefer ownership, but because ownership is economically superior under the regulatory model they operate within. For Anterix, this dynamic is highly favourable. As utilities increasingly internalise the rate-base benefit of owning spectrum, outright sales — which represent the most complete and immediate monetisation of Anterix’s licences — are likely to become the preferred structure. It also means that the 60+ potential customers in the pipeline have a structural financial incentive built into their regulatory frameworks to buy rather than rent, creating durable and growing demand.

Key financial metrics as of April 2026:

  • Over $400M in contracted proceeds from 12 signed deals
  • ~$123M in contracted proceeds outstanding as of Q3 FY2026
  • $80M+ expected in Q4 FY2026
  • Zero debt on the balance sheet
  • Cash and restricted cash ~$38M (December 2025)
  • 18.96M shares outstanding; market cap ~$758M at $40/share
  • Spectrum assets carried on balance sheet at $325M — far below monetisation potential

Adjacent revenue streams include TowerX (with Crown Castle, 40,000+ tower sites) and CatalyX (SIM/eSIM management), with a combined addressable market that management estimates at approximately $1 billion annually. The AnterixAccelerator programme has $250M in active negotiations and is described as “oversubscribed.”

How Shareholders Can Realise Value

Path 1 — Organic pipeline conversion. The $3 billion pipeline across 60+ potential customers is the standalone story. Converting even 30–40% at historical deal prices would generate $900M–$1.2B in additional contracted proceeds — meaningfully in excess of the current market cap. Management confirmed at the April 2026 investor call that it will discontinue the “Demonstrated Intent” disclosure in Q4 FY2026, signalling that the pipeline is maturing beyond the need for such granular tracking.

Path 2 — Strategic transaction. The Morgan Stanley-led strategic review remains active. The Amazon/Globalstar precedent (117% premium, $11.57B) powerfully illustrates what strategic acquirers pay for irreplaceable licensed spectrum. B. Riley analysts estimate a plausible acquisition price of approximately $75/share — an 88% premium to the current price. Potential acquirers include infrastructure funds (Brookfield, DigitalBridge, Stonepeak), Crown Castle, Ericsson, Nokia, Qualcomm, and utility consortia — each with compelling strategic motivation.

Path 3 — Consumer and satellite market expansion. The Qualcomm chipset partnership and the Lynk satellite D2D experimental licence open a third path: transformation from a utility-only spectrum licensor into a platform for mass-market consumer and satellite connectivity. If even a fraction of this optionality is realised, the addressable market resets from $3 billion to many multiples of that figure.

Who Could Acquire Anterix?

The Morgan Stanley strategic review has been running since February 2025 with confirmed ongoing inbound interest. The Amazon/Globalstar deal — $11.57 billion at a 117% premium, announced just days ago — is the most powerful recent proof point that strategic buyers pay extraordinary prices for irreplaceable licensed spectrum. Several categories of acquirer have both the motivation and the financial capacity to acquire Anterix at a meaningful premium to current market prices.

Infrastructure and digital infrastructure funds. Firms such as Brookfield Infrastructure, DigitalBridge, Stonepeak and KKR Infrastructure are the most natural fit. Anterix matches their template precisely: a dominant licensed asset with a structural moat, generating long-dated contracted cash flows from investment-grade regulated utility customers, zero debt, and an expanding addressable market. A take-private at $0.80–$1.20/MHz-POP would be highly value-accretive for a fund with patient capital and the operational resources to accelerate pipeline conversion.

Crown Castle. The tower company already operates the TowerX partnership with Anterix, giving it direct commercial insight into the business and its utility customer relationships. Acquiring Anterix would transform Crown Castle from a passive tower lessor into a vertically integrated private wireless infrastructure provider — owning both the tower layer and the spectrum layer in every utility deployment. This vertical integration would enable Crown Castle to capture a significantly larger share of the value chain per deal.

Telecom equipment vendors. Ericsson and Nokia are both deeply embedded in the Anterix ecosystem and supply radio equipment for 900 MHz deployments. Either could acquire Anterix to vertically integrate the spectrum layer, gaining a decisive competitive advantage in winning utility network build-out contracts. A utility procuring a 900 MHz private LTE network from Ericsson-plus-Anterix would deal with a single vendor controlling spectrum, equipment and deployment. Qualcomm, which deepened its chipset partnership in February 2026, is a more speculative but not implausible candidate given its strategic interest in expanding 900 MHz into consumer devices.

Large utility consortia. A consortium of major US utilities — perhaps led by NextEra Energy, Duke Energy or Dominion — could acquire Anterix to permanently lock in spectrum access and prevent competitors from securing it. As grid modernisation accelerates and 900 MHz becomes the de facto standard for utility private wireless, the long-term cost of not owning the underlying spectrum layer could become material. A consortium acquisition would also allow participating utilities to reduce per-unit spectrum costs and share clearing and licensing infrastructure.

Hyperscalers and large technology companies. The Amazon/Globalstar deal confirms that the world’s largest technology companies are willing to pay over $11 billion for irreplaceable licensed spectrum assets. Microsoft, Google and Amazon all have industrial IoT and grid infrastructure ambitions. Owning the licensed spectrum layer for US utility infrastructure — now expandable to 10 MHz and increasingly relevant to consumer devices through the Qualcomm partnership — would represent an extraordinary strategic asset for any hyperscaler seeking to build an industrial connectivity platform.

B. Riley analysts have estimated that a strategic buyer would likely pay above the market-implied level but below the average of Anterix’s own signed deals, suggesting a plausible acquisition range of approximately $0.77–$0.87/MHz-POP — implying a share price of approximately $75, or roughly 88% above today’s $40. Any acquirer with the ability to accelerate pipeline conversion would rationally pay more than the public market implies, given that the underlying asset value is validated by ten arm’s-length utility transactions at materially higher per-MHz-POP prices.

Valuation: Three Tables Tell the Story

We present three analytical tables. Table 1 shows Anterix’s own signed deals — the most directly comparable transactions. Table 2 provides broader market context, including FCC auctions, the Amazon/Globalstar deal, Grain Management’s 800 MHz acquisition, and the crucial NextNav (NN) peer comparison. Table 3 shows implied company valuation and per-share price across scenarios, all calculated at the current price of $40 and 18.96 million shares outstanding.

Source: Anterix SEC Form 8-K filings; Light Reading; Evercore analyst note; B. Riley Securities research (March 2025); company confirmation (April 2026). MHz-POP calculations: author’s own. ★ = LCRA original (April 2023) is the highest $/MHz-POP deal on record at ~.57. † Oncor: company territory population is 13M but 95-county coverage population estimated at ~11M; author uses ~11M for MHz-POP. ‡ Average calculated on Ameren, SDG&E, Evergy, Xcel, and Oncor (the five largest investor-owned utility deals at 6 MHz). Benton PUD (10 MHz, rural county) and TNMP/LCRA (smaller or partial coverage) excluded from average as not directly comparable for pricing benchmarks.

Source: FCC public auction records (Auctions 97, 105, 107); EchoStar SEC Form 8-K (August 2025); Amazon press release (April 14, 2026); Bloomberg; Grain Management press release (March 20, 2025); Broadband Breakfast (April 1, 2026); TradingView/Oppenheimer (April 2026); IEEE ComSoc Technology Blog. † Author’s own MHz-POP calculations. * Amazon/Globalstar not directly comparable due to global MSS licence structure; shown for strategic context only. NextNav (NN): market cap ~$2.9B as of April 2026; estimated 15 MHz contiguous lower 900 MHz spectrum (902–928 MHz); different band and use case from Anterix (PNT/GPS backup vs. broadband); no utility contracts; pre-revenue; shown as 900 MHz band valuation reference only.

The NextNav (NASDAQ: NN) comparison deserves particular attention. NextNav holds approximately 15 MHz of lower 900 MHz band spectrum (902–928 MHz) and trades at a market capitalisation of approximately $2.9 billion — implying roughly $0.58/MHz-POP. This is 40% above Anterix’s current implied $/MHz-POP of $0.41. Yet NextNav has no utility contracts, generates essentially no revenue from its spectrum, and its business case depends on a speculative FCC rulemaking for GPS backup services that has yet to be approved. Anterix, by contrast, has $400M+ in contracted proceeds, 10 signed utility customers, and a proven commercial market. If Anterix were to trade at NextNav’s implied $/MHz-POP, the share price would be approximately $57 — already 43% above today’s level. Oppenheimer’s $0.80/MHz-POP target for NextNav, applied to Anterix’s 6 MHz position, implies an Anterix share price of approximately $120.

Source: † Per-share figures are author’s own calculations: ($/MHz-POP × 6 MHz × 308M US population covered) / 18.96M shares. CFO valuation ranges from Q2 FY2026 earnings call (November 13, 2025) and April 9, 2026 investor call. B. Riley $75/share from March 2025 research note. NextNav comparison: author’s own calculation applying NN’s implied $/MHz-POP to ATEX’s 6 MHz position. Deal average updated to $1.49 following company corrections (April 2026). Figures exclude cash (~$38M), TowerX/CatalyX revenue, and pipeline option value — spectrum value only; a floor estimate, not a ceiling. Not financial advice.

The most striking observation from Table 3: at $40/share, the market implies Anterix’s spectrum is worth $0.41/MHz-POP — well below NextNav’s implied multiple despite NextNav having no contracts, less than one-third of what every major Anterix utility customer has paid in arm’s-length transactions, and less than one-ninth of the LCRA deal, which stands as the highest $/MHz-POP transaction on record at $3.57. Management’s own $7 billion upper bound (10 MHz basis) implies a share price of $369. Even B. Riley’s conservative M&A scenario ($75/share) represents 88% upside from today.

Key Risks

  • Execution and pace: The $3B pipeline is not contracted. Utilities have been slow historical decision-makers, and conversion timelines are difficult to predict.
  • FCC licence delivery: Licences are granted county by county as incumbents are cleared. Anterix estimated in its 2020 shareholder letter that total clearing and licensing costs would range from $130–$160 million nationally. Complex-system counties — where operators with 45 or more integrated sites are exempt from mandatory retuning — require voluntary negotiation, which can be protracted and is not guaranteed to succeed on commercially acceptable terms.
  • Strategic review uncertainty: The Morgan Stanley process has run 14+ months with no announced deal. There is no guarantee it results in a transaction.
  • Cash runway: With ~$38M in cash and no debt, Anterix is dependent on contracted proceeds arriving on schedule. Operational discipline remains critical.
  • Liquidity and volatility: With ~18.96M shares outstanding and 90%+ institutional ownership, ATEX is thinly traded and susceptible to outsized price moves on news events.
  • Grain competition: Grain Management’s 800 MHz portfolio (acquired from T-Mobile for ~$2.9B) targets a similar utility customer base. While the bands differ in propagation characteristics and ecosystem maturity, Grain represents a credible competitive alternative for utilities evaluating private wireless options.
  • Satellite and consumer optionality remains speculative: The Lynk partnership and the Qualcomm consumer device roadmap are not contracted revenue. FCC approval for satellite D2D operations on 900 MHz is not guaranteed.

Summary: A De Facto Monopoly at a Rare Discount, With Multiple Expanding Catalysts

Anterix is not a conventional investment. Its value resides in its spectrum asset — a finite, legally protected nationwide spectrum franchise representing a de facto monopoly position that took a decade to build and cannot be replicated. The opportunity exists because most investors do not follow small-cap spectrum companies. A company whose own management describes its spectrum as worth $2.5 billion to over $7 billion trades at a market capitalisation of approximately $758 million.

When we last published ideas generating 500%+ returns, the common thread was a structurally mispriced asset with multiple catalysts converging. Anterix today presents more converging catalysts than any other opportunity we have seen:

  • The February 2026 FCC ruling doubled capacity and permanently expanded the addressable market.
  • The Qualcomm partnership (February 2026) brings 900 MHz into the consumer device chipset roadmap and signals a credible path to an Apple-like deal.
  • The Lynk Global experimental licence opens the satellite-to-consumer frontier on Anterix’s spectrum.
  • Amazon paid $11.57B for Globalstar (April 2026) at a 117% premium — confirming that the world’s largest technology companies pay extraordinary prices for irreplaceable licensed spectrum.
  • NextNav (NN) trades at ~$0.58/MHz-POP ($2.9B market cap) with no utility contracts, versus Anterix’s $0.41/MHz-POP with $400M+ contracted. The closest 900 MHz band peer is valued 40% higher despite having nothing comparable to show for it.
  • Grain Management paid ~$2.9B for 800 MHz utility-focused spectrum — a comparable low-band transaction at $0.64/MHz-POP versus Anterix’s implied $0.41.
  • The Morgan Stanley strategic review remains active, with management confirming ongoing inbound interest.
  • Management’s own spectrum valuation ($2.5B–$7B+) is 3–9x the current market cap of $758M.

For an investor with a 2–4 year horizon and tolerance for execution risk, ATEX offers an irreplaceable spectrum franchise with a structural moat, a live M&A process, a validated and growing customer base, three expanding market opportunities (utility, industrial/satellite, consumer), and a valuation that implies the market believes the spectrum is worth less than any comparable public auction or private transaction has ever suggested.

In a market where most “value” investments are commodities dressed as moats, Anterix has a real one: written into FCC regulations, validated by ten of America’s largest regulated utilities, deepened by Qualcomm’s chipset partnership, and now positioned at the frontier of the satellite direct-to-device revolution.

Important Disclaimer

This article is produced for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Spectrum valuations are inherently uncertain. Management estimates are forward-looking statements subject to material risks and uncertainties. Past deal prices are not guarantees of future transaction values. All numerical calculations are the author’s own unless otherwise noted. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

R&S Group Leading Transformer Producer – Cash flow and deleveraging stand out

R+S Group ($RSGN), the European leader in electricity transformers, reported strong numbers.

The thesis is playing well, rerating in progress. Still a long way to go 24 CHF today vs 40 CHF in September, when it was valued in line with its peers. Congratulations to those who bought at 17 CHF with us.

Overall, the new figures reinforce our constructive stance on the company.

Operational EBITDA reached cCHF85m, corresponding to a margin of c20.5%

What stands out most is the very strong free cash flow generation. FCF of CHF48m significantly exceeded the Bernberg CHF16m estimate, pointing to solid working-capital discipline and strong cash conversion from earnings.

Robust cash generation allowed the company to delever the balance sheet much faster than we expected, with net debt declining to CHF63m or just 0.7x EBITDA, compared with the Bernberg estimate of 1.1x.

Order intake of CHF477m in 2025 resulted in a book-to-bill ratio of around 1.15x and lifted the backlog to CHF326m, providing solid revenue visibility into 2026 and, to a degree, 2027.

We would be buyers, as the case is being derisked. We are fully invested up to our max positioning.

Read the previous post here on R+S Group – includes the full investment thesis.

Follow us on Substack (free access):

https://substack.com/chat/5509776

R&S Group: Europe’s Transformer Leader at a Deep Discount



Why We Like R&S

R&S Group Holding AG (SWX: RSGN) is a rare beast in Europe’s energy transition. It designs and builds medium- and high-voltage transformers. Its footprint spans Switzerland, Poland, Croatia, Ireland, and Finland. It serves utilities, industrial clients, and renewable developers.

The company is sitting on a huge structural tailwind. Europe’s grids are old, and demand for electricity is rising faster than ever. Renewable energy integration, electric vehicles, and digital infrastructure growth are pushing the need for more reliable transformers. R&S has the plants, the product range, and the long-term relationships to capture all of this demand.

Here’s the quick take:

  • Structural tailwinds: Grid renewal, EVs, data centers, and decentralized renewables support multi-year growth.
  • Operational edge: Fully integrated product portfolio, top-quartile margins, and strong customer relationships.
  • Revenue visibility: CHF 320m backlog covers most of FY 2026 production.
  • Valuation: Trades at ~11× EV/EBITDA 2026E vs. 17× for peers. Berenberg’s CHF 40 target implies >100% upside.
  • Market overreaction: A 30% drop after an “immaterial” guidance update creates a high-conviction buying window.

Company Overview

R&S isn’t just another industrial manufacturer. It is a full-service transformer solution provider. Its six plants give it geographic reach, operational flexibility, and risk diversification across multiple countries. This is particularly important in a sector where lead times matter and supply chain disruptions can impact delivery.

The 2024 Kyte Powertech acquisition expanded its footprint into higher-voltage applications. Combined with its existing portfolio—from 50 kVA to 250 MVA, including dry-type, cast-resin, and oil-filled transformers—R&S is one of the few mid-cap companies in Europe that can offer a complete, end-to-end solution.

Long-term contracts with national grids, industrial OEMs, and renewable developers provide recurring revenue streams. These contracts give the company high visibility into both volume and pricing, which is particularly valuable in a capital-intensive sector like transformer manufacturing.


Structural Tailwinds

The growth runway for R&S is extremely visible:

  1. Grid renewal: Roughly 30% of Europe’s electricity grid is over 40 years old. Transformers are critical for replacing aging infrastructure. Many of these grids were built in the 1970s and 1980s. Without updates, reliability risks increase, especially as energy demand surges. R&S is perfectly positioned to benefit.
  2. Electrification & data centers: EV adoption, heat pumps, and data-center expansion are driving electricity consumption higher. This creates both volume growth and pricing power for transformer manufacturers. Companies with the capacity to scale production while maintaining quality are rare, and R&S is one of them.
  3. Decentralized renewables: Tens of thousands of new connection points across Europe are required for solar, wind, and other renewable projects. Each connection requires medium- or high-voltage transformers. For R&S, this translates into repeatable, long-term demand, particularly for high-margin cast-resin and oil-filled units.

Berenberg estimates that European grid investment could exceed €12 billion through 2027. That is a multi-year runway for R&S’s core products, ensuring sustained visibility into both revenue and margins.


Competitive Advantages

R&S has built a durable competitive moat.

  • Pan-European footprint: Six strategically located plants reduce logistics costs, speed delivery, and provide localized customer support. This also limits disruption risk from any single country.
  • Full product range: 50 kVA–250 MVA, dry-type, cast-resin, and oil-filled transformers. Customers can get everything from one supplier, which increases stickiness and recurring business.
  • Technology edge: High-value cast-resin transformers command premium margins. They also meet stringent environmental and safety standards, which increasingly matter to utilities and industrial clients.
  • Operational efficiency: The Poland Krzeczów facility and ongoing debottlenecking projects boost throughput, shorten lead times, and increase profit. Scale matters in this industry, and R&S has been relentless in improving efficiency.

These advantages allow R&S to maintain top-quartile margins and pricing discipline even in competitive markets and despite low-cost competition from Asia.


Operational Momentum & Backlog

R&S has a diverse customer base spanning national grids, renewable developers, and industrial OEMs.

Key points:

  • Backlog: CHF 320m, covering most of FY 2026 production. This gives the company both revenue visibility and leverage in pricing.
  • Revenue growth: Expected CAGR of 10–13% through 2027, supported by both price and volume.
  • Capacity utilization: Near 100% at key plants, highlighting the importance of ongoing capacity expansion.

Strong backlog coverage also allows R&S to pass on raw material cost inflation through contracts. This reduces earnings volatility and ensures consistent cash flow.


Operational and Financial Highlights

Metric20242025E2026E2027E
Sales (CHF m)283421468510
EBITDA margin23.9%21.8%21.0%21.3%
EBIT margin22.2%19.7%18.8%19.0%
EPS (CHF)1.251.581.711.92
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×1.0×0.7×0.2×
EV / EBITDA (2026E)~10.9×Peers ~17×

Source: Berenberg Initiation (Oct 2025) and Flash Update (Nov 2025)

Operational KPI

MetricFY 2023AFY 2024A1H 2025AFY 2025E
Order backlog (CHF m)268295306310 (E)
Revenue (CHF m)239282156315 (E)
YoY Growth (%)+18%+10% H1+12% E
Capacity utilization (%)~92>95~100~100

Source: Berenberg Initiation (Oct 2025) and Flash Update (Nov 2025)


Capacity Expansion

R&S’s growth and margin resilience come from strategic capacity expansion.

  • Poland (Krzeczów): +40% capacity, focusing on distribution and cast-resin transformers. Faster delivery, lower costs.
  • Croatia & Switzerland: Debottlenecking and automation upgrades to increase throughput and standardize components.
  • Ireland (Kyte Powertech): Higher-voltage capabilities and diversification of revenue streams.

Overall, output is expected to rise >50% by 2027. Most of this expansion is already covered by confirmed orders, minimizing execution risk while protecting margins.


Margin Evolution

Margins remain strong due to a combination of product mix, operational scale, and plant efficiency.

MetricFY 2023AFY 2024AFY 2025EFY 2026EFY 2027E
EBITDA margin (%)18.620.020.821.121.2
EBIT margin (%)16.018.419.219.820.0
ROCE (%)4955586060+

Source: Berenberg Initiation (Oct 2025) and Flash Update (Nov 2025)

High-value cast-resin units and ongoing operational improvements in Poland ensure margins remain near 20%, a rare combination of growth and profitability for mid-cap industrials.


Financial Strength

R&S has cleaned up its balance sheet, creating optionality for investors:

MetricFY 2024AFY 2025EFY 2026EFY 2027E
Net Debt / EBITDA (x)1.30.80.40.2
Equity Ratio (%)11223036
FCF Yield (%)3.44.95.56.1

Source: Berenberg Initiation (Oct 2025) and Flash Update (Nov 2025)

Disciplined capex (~3–4% of sales) plus strong free cash flow sets up M&A or dividend potential post-2026.


Valuation

R&S trades at a deep discount to peers, despite top-quartile margins and strong visibility.

Metric (2026E)R&S GroupPeer MedianPremium / Discount
EV / EBITDA (x)10.9×17.0×-36%
P / E (x)14.5×23.8×-39%
FCF Yield (%)5.5%3.2%+71%

Source: Berenberg Initiation (Oct 2025) and Flash Update (Nov 2025)

Berenberg’s CHF 40 target comes from a DCF (70%) and 13× EV/EBITDA multiple (30%). At CHF 18.82, upside is >100%, with FCF yield >6%.


Recent Sell-Off

On 6 November 2025, R&S issued an “immaterial” guidance update. The stock fell ~30%.

We see this as a buying opportunity:

  • Structural tailwinds remain intact.
  • Backlog coverage protects revenue.
  • Valuation discount widens the upside.

Market reaction was overblown. Fundamentals haven’t changed, making this an ideal entry point for long-term investors.


Risks

  • Macroeconomics: Slow GDP growth could delay grid investments.
  • Regulatory: EU energy policies or subsidies may shift, affecting renewable integration timelines.
  • Supply chain & commodities: Copper, steel, and insulation material volatility can temporarily impact margins.
  • Currency: CHF reporting vs. EUR costs introduces FX risk.
  • Execution: Simultaneous plant expansions could cause temporary margin pressure.

These risks are manageable thanks to backlog coverage, pass-through contracts, and geographic diversification.


Investment Case Summary

R&S is a pure-play, defensive growth compounder with strong upside potential.

DriverImpact
European grid renewal & electrificationMulti-year growth tailwind
Full FY 2026 backlogRevenue visibility & pricing power
19–20% EBIT marginTop-quartile profitability
Rapid deleveragingRoom for M&A/dividends
35–40% discount to peersRe-rating potential
High scarcity valueFew pure-play listed EU transformer peers

Source: Berenberg Initiation (Oct 2025) and Flash Update (Nov 2025)


Conclusion

R&S Group is a rare mid-cap in Europe with pure exposure to energy transition themes. Integrated products, strong margins, backlog visibility, and a healthier balance sheet make it both defensive and high-growth.

With >100% upside to CHF 40, the recent pullback is a high-conviction entry point.


Disclosure: The author’s family office holds a long position in R&S Group Holding AG. Analysis based on publicly available information, including Berenberg research (Oct 2025 Initiation and Nov 2025 Flash Update).

The goal of the blog is to provide investment ideas for further research. I/we have a beneficial position in the shares discussed above either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. The article does not represent investment advice. Please do your own research before making any investment action.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Nobody Kills Drones like EOS – Minutes From the CEO Call

EOS is the most accurate in killing drones with bullets and lasers.

We have never lost any competitive trial for drone killing. We have not lost to Americans, Israelis, or anyone. In a recent competition in Israel, we were the only ones to shoot down 100% of the drones.

Andreas Schwer, CEO of EOS

Please look at the previous posts on EOS on this blog to see the full investment thesis.

Last week, German Broker Montega organised a call with EOS CEO Andreas Schwer. Below are the main quotes from the call and the presentation.

Quotes from the call:

  • 380 employees now
  • We have never lost any competitive trial for drone killing. We have not lost to Americans, Israelis, or anyone. In a recent competition in Israel, we were the only ones to shoot down 100% of the drones.
  • We have been selected by the US Army to use our weapon station for the next generation of tanks. We are the sole partner for this project.
  • With a laser, we can kill up to 30 drones per minute. With a bullet, we can kill 4-5 per minute.
  • Germany wants to spend up to 40 billion euros to protect its airspace. Drone defence should be a big part of that budget. We will be bidding for the segment.
  • We are the only ones who can deliver a 100kW laser together with Rafael. Three different parties own Rafael´s laser IP. EOS owns all IP for its laser weapon.
  • We can kill drones flying up to speeds of 500km/h
  • We can kill drones up to 3 km with a bullet, laser up to 6 km and 8 km with rocket systems.
  • We have the widest portfolio of Remote Weapon Stations; no one else has such a broad product range.
  • The most popular system is Slinger, developed to kill drones.
  • The latest product is R500—the next-generation system with all AI functionality. We are developing this with the US Army. All new generation tanks will be equipped with such a system.
  • Rheinmetal is selling the Skyranger with a 35mm cannon for 7 times the price of our system. Its accuracy is similar to our system. Skyranger uses a 35mm cannon, while we use a 30mm cannon, which is the NATO standard.
  • Skyranger costs 14 million USD. For that, you can buy 7 of our systems, and with those 7 systems, you can protect many more assets than with one Skyranger. Our system is also much lighter, so it can be mounted on any vehicle. Our system can kill drones at the same rate as Skyranger. So 7 systems can kill 7x as many drones as Skyranger.
  • We are working on improving our AI capabilities. We are in advanced negotiations, and we may announce an exciting AI deal in the next few months.
  • Our current AI capability enables us to link several Remote Weapon Stations. If a fleet of drones comes, the AI system will decide which RWS will kill which drone.
  • Our first 100kW laser was sold to the Dutch at 71 million euros (125 Australian dollars)
  • We will have a laser partnership by Q1 2026 to capture the French market.
  • The German parliament stopped the Rhinmetal contract, because we could deliver the system at half price and half the time. We will bid for the contract next year in an open competition.
  • Many governments have reached out to us for quotes on the laser weapon. Sales would be conducted using the same documentation we used for the Dutch sale – it is a NATO-standardised contract that any NATO state can use.
  • High-energy laser weapon – we are in negotiations with several parties. We see laser weapon annual revenues of 1.5-2 billion Australian dollars within 3 years with 15-20% EBITDA margins.
  • Space control is our future. We are the most advanced in Europe at shooting down satellites. Only two US companies can compete, but they will not deliver outside the US. We are the only ones in Europe. This will be an even bigger business for us than laser in the 2030s.
  • Our partners – we have partners in most countries where we deliver:
    • In Germany, our partner for RWS is Deal, and for laser, it is Helsing. For Space warfare is OHT.
    • France, KMDS is the partner for RWS.
    • In the UK, we are partnered with MSI, and we can not disclose the partner
    • In Italy, we are partners with Leonardo
  • We are in negotiations with more than 10 governments regarding the sale of laser weapons.
  • We hope the Dutch will buy an additional laser weapon next year for testing by their navy.
  • We are planning to conduct live laser and cannon testing next year in the UAE. That can generate even more interest. We will be inviting many global potential customers. It will be a significant event.
  • All our laser IP is in Singapore. The reason is that it is easier to export IPO from Singapore than from any other country.
  • The most significant hurdle for our future growth is human capital. We have received unsolicited offers from top engineers from our competitors. We have hired those highly sophisticated engineers. The reason is that they wanted their products in real life.
  • We are valued at only 700 million USD. We have had a couple of takeover conversations. I cannot disclose more, but we can be bought out of the market. If any firm offers come, the board will come. We would not submit any offer to the board below 10 dollars.
  • If we secure a contract pipeline of 40-50 laser weapons, the share price will be well above $ 20.
  • We are still early into our growth story. Our objective is 40-50 dollars, so investors have not missed anything yet. We are still very early and very affordable.

Do look at previous posts for more details on the EOS investment thesis.

Disclosure: 

The goal of the blog is to provide investment ideas for further research. I/we have a beneficial position in the shares discussed above either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. The article does not represent investment advice. Please do your own research before making any investment action.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Nobody Kills Drones like EOS – with bullet and laser!

EOS has the most accurate weapon for killing drones. They have the most precise weapon that kills Russian drones in Ukraine. The stock sold off 48% from its recent all-time high, together with similar defence stocks.

EOS is our top idea for the following year. Our base case is that the stock should triple over the period. The driver will be the European Drone Wall, as well as additional sales of its laser drone weapon.

Below is a copy of an email sent out by Fearnley Securities.

What’s happened?

  1. EOS has seen a sharp drawdown, off 48% from its recent $10.42 high à the momentum and sentiment that took it to these highs came following the announcement of their recent $125m HELW contract with the Netherlands, a NATO country. Management have also publicly referred to many additional HELW opportunities, with multiple countries enquiring about large scale orders; South Korea and other EU nations.
  1. Management have long cited that progress towards peace deals in Ukraine and the Middle East may contest with the sentiment that has driven capital allocation to defence stocks globally, however the fact remains that drones and drone warfare are now seemingly entrenched in daily life for Russia, Ukraine, and remain in the headlines across all of Europe.

HELW state of play and opportunities:

  1. Since the initial announcement of the 100KW HELW contract, EOS have since announced that their ‘Apollo’ HELW is scalable to 150KW. While we have not seen additional HELW contracts for EOS, we note that the advent of HELW purchasing is increasing, which in our view underscores that these weapons are now widely accepted as commercially scalable defence solutions, and will be a core part of all militaries moving forwards.
  2. A reminder; traditional kinetic interceptors are economically unsustainable when $1,000 drones require $500,000 missiles for defeat à Russia’s 28th Sept attack on Ukraine saw 600 drones wreak havoc across Kiev à this comes at the same time the US is mulling approval of a $90bn funding package for Ukraine.
  1. Multiple HELW systems are transitioning from prototype to operational deployment in 2025-2027 timeframe à But EOS remains one of the only suppliers who can deliver 150KW units:
    1. Israel Iron Beam: End 2025​
    2. UK DragonFire: 2027 on Royal Navy ships​
    3. US Army IFPC-HEL: 2024 prototypes, mass production mid-2020s​
    4. Germany Rheinmetall/MBDA: 2029-2030 maritime deployment​
    5. Taiwan T Dome
    6. EOS Apollo: 2025-2028 delivery to European NATO state​​

Reminder of the EU opportunity for EOS:

  1. EOS controls over 90% of its HELW intellectual property in-house, delivering a fully ITAR-free solution – a critical differentiator that eliminates U.S. export restrictions and enables flexible licensing across all EU countries, this positions EOS to offer:
    1. Turnkey technology licensing to EU member state defense contractors.
    2. Co-production agreements establishing HELW production lines within EU borders à reminder that EOS has already licensed its technology through its partnership with Diehl Defence GmbH in Germany.
    3. Sovereign capability development meeting EU procurement preferences for 60% European-sourced defense equipment by 2030, and 40% of defense purchases be made through joint contracts by 2027.
  2. The recent European Drone Defence Initiative (EDDI), released on the 16th October, outlines EU$800bn of funding to be allocated to developing technologies such as High Energy Laser Weapons/Directed Energy Weapons in Europe.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Disclosure: 

The goal of the blog is to provide investment ideas for further research. I/we have a beneficial position in the shares discussed above either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. The article does not represent investment advice. Please do your own research before making any investment action.

ShaMaran Petroleum – Deal Misunderstood – Material Upside Potential

Summary:

  • ShaMaran Petroleum (SNM.ST, SNM.CA) is poised for significant upside following the reopening of the Iraq-Turkey pipeline and the new export agreement.
  • SNM’s netbacks are set to nearly double in 2026, with free cash flow expected to exceed $200 million, enabling debt repayment and potential dividends or buybacks.
  • With a rerating to 6x FCF, SNM shares could see 100% upside in 12 months, supported by strong cash flow and shareholder returns.

ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. is poised to benefit from the reopening of the Iraq-Turkey pipeline, which will facilitate the export of oil from the Kurdistan region.

The pipeline reopened over the weekend, but the share price did not move much. The announced deal was more complex than the consensus expected. I read any research I could find on the resumption, but I did not understand what was going on and why the share price was not doubling. I spent the time to investigate. My take is that the market does not appreciate what is happening.

Surprisingly, the brokers are not providing much help; the research reports are quite unclear.

Introduction to ShaMaran Petroleum

ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. (OMX: SNM.ST, TSXV: SNM.CA) is an independent oil and gas company that produces from two adjacent blocks in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Shamaran is part of the Lundin Group, and the Lundin family is the largest shareholder, holding around a 30% stake, as well as the largest bondholder.

The Lundin family provides significant support to ShaMaran. William Lundin, who is on the board, bought ShaMaran shares in December 2024.

ShaMaran indirectly holds a 50% working interest (66.67% paying interest) in the Atrush Block and an 18% interest (22.5% paying interest) in the Sarsang Block.

Both assets are operated by the Ross Perot, Jr. company, HKN. The Perot family has a prominent Texas-based business with strong ties to Kurdistan and the Trump Administration. ShaMaran doubled its working interest production last year to over 20k barrels per day.

ShaMaran’s market capitalisation is around $600 million, and its net debt is $90 million. The stock is listed on the Canadian and Swedish exchanges. It is quite liquid, with a daily trading volume of around $1 million.

Why was the pipeline closed, and why did the reopening negotiations take so long?

The 2023 closure of the Iraq-Turkey pipeline resulted from a dispute between the Kurdistan Regional Government and the Iraqi central government over how Kurdistan’s oil revenues should be collected and shared.

Before the agreement was announced in September, the Kurdistan government collected about 50% of the take from all oil produced in Kurdistan. At the same time, Kurdistan was not funded from the central state budget.

Under the new agreement, Kurdistan relinquished all its oil revenues and will instead receive its share of the federal budget. Kurdistan has 14% of the population of Iraq, so it will get 14% of the federal budget, which is more than they have been making from oil under the old regime.

There is a significant mistrust between the central Iraqi government and the Kurdistan Regional Government. A considerable amount of time was spent on establishing a procedure to monitor actual oil sales, ensuring that no revenues would be missed.

What prices were ShaMaran selling while the pipeline WAS CLOSED?

In the first half of 2025, Shamaran sold to local traders and achieved revenue per barrel of $32 – $35. From this amount, the Kurdistan government took about 50%, so the actual net amount returned to ShaMaran was $16-$17.50. With a net production of over 20k barrels of oil per day, that is over $100 million in annual cash flow for ShaMaran.

What prices is ShaMaran selling after the pipeline REOPENED?

The parties agreed to establish an interim three-month mechanism to build trust between them.

Under the mechanism, ShaMaran would collect an initial payment of $16 per barrel, less a $2 transportation fee. During these three months, the contracts will be reviewed by Wood Mackenzie consultants. The interim period is expected to conclude in December. Wood MacKenzie is tasked to produce a certification of the process. After that is completed, ShaMaran will get a retrospective payment of an additional net $16 per barrel, approximately. The retrospective payments for deliveries made in 2025 should be paid out during the first quarter of 2026.

From January 2026, ShaMaran and others will collect the full market price for their oil, as per their contracts (more than $32 per barrel net back for ShaMaran). In summary, by 2026, the net realised price is expected to almost double compared to 2025.

The net backs and cash flow numbers mentioned in the text are an approximation based on current Brent oil prices.

ShaMaran terms provide them with the market price (Brent) for their oil, adjusted for oil quality (API) and transportation costs, so them net backs and cash flow will fluctuate with the oil price starting now.

What will be the impact of the pipeline reopening on ShaMaran’s FCF?

ShaMaran is a very lean producer. The lifting costs are very low, at $3-$5 per barrel, and the maintenance capital expenditure is also low, at $2 per barrel. ShaMaran was able to generate very healthy cash flows, even from local sales.

ShaMaran’s guidance is to generate FCF of $100 million in 2025. The FCF in 2026 is expected to more than double, exceeding $200 million, which will enable the company to repay all of its debt, initiate dividend payments, and/or repurchase shares.

Who will repay the old receivable that ShaMaran has from the Kurdistan Government?

When the pipeline closed, ShaMaran had $102 million in receivables from the Kurdistan Government. It was agreed that the receivables would remain the responsibility of the Kurdistan government. The debt is already being repaid – from $95 million at the end of 2023 to $69 million at the end of 2024 to $53 million as of the end of June 2025.

The receivable represents approximately 60% of ShaMaran’s net debt position of $90 million as of the end of June 2025.

What are the risks?

ShaMaran has a very strong balance sheet. Its net debt is only $90 million as of June, vs its $600 million market capitalisation. With the strong cash flow generation, ShaMaran is expected to be net cash positive by the first half of 2026 at the latest. 

The main risk is political. The deal took two years to negotiate. The Iraqi parliament approved the agreement and has broader political support. The deal has the support of the US Government, whose officials have travelled several times to Iraq to push for the deal. Nevertheless, the risk is there; it is a politically less stable region. 

What is the valuation impact of the reopening?

The consensus expected that ShaMaran would start selling oil at double prices from day one. It did happen, but in a structured way. The market was not prepared for this, and many retail investors might not have fully understood the deal.

One year before the pipeline reopened, ShaMaran was trading at 4 times FCF. If the exact multiple is maintained after the new process is certified and net realisable prices double, the share price should rerate at least by 30%.

Historically, Kurdistan producers have traded at a discount due to the perceived risk that the central Iraqi government would not recognise Kurdistan oil exports. Now that the central government has recognised their contracts, and Iraq is in charge of Kurdistan’s oil exports, the discount should be removed.

If the share price were to rerate to 6 times FCF, the upside potential increases to 100%.

Strong cash flow generation should enable ShaMaran to start buybacks and/or dividends as early as next year. That should further support the rerating. We see 100% upside potential in the next 12 months.

FCFP/FCFMkt capShare price
$ million$ millionSEK
Before reopening10044001.3
Today10066001.9
202620036001.9
202620048002.5
2026200510003.2
2026200612003.8

Source: our calculations

Conclusion

ShaMaran is a well-run company from the respected Lundin group. The pipeline reopening should double the price ShaMaran can collect for its oil. The price increase should more than double its FCF and its valuation.

Strong FCF should enable the company to become net cash positive during the first half of 2026. I expect dividends or buybacks possibly already in 2026. 

Ranked #1 by SumZero: Best Performing Idea Generator Over the Last 12 Months

We are proud to announce that we have been ranked the #1 best-performing idea generator by SumZero over the Last Twelve Months (LTM) category.

SumZero is the premier online community exclusively for professional investors, bringing together hedge fund, mutual fund, private equity, and proprietary trading professionals.

SumZero hosts a platform of peer-reviewed, long-form investment research contributed by more than 16,000 buyside members. Members gain access to over 12,000 detailed theses on publicly traded securities, offering transparency with disclosure of analyst and fund names, thorough valuation, risks, catalysts, and defined investment timeframes.

After ranking in the top ten over recent months, it is the first time we have reached the #1 spot.

We invite you to subscribe for free and stay connected to our latest investment ideas, market insights, and performance updates.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Disclosure: 

The goal of the blog is to provide investment ideas for further research. I/we have a beneficial position in the shares discussed above, either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. The article does not represent investment advice. Please do your own research before making any investment action.

EOS up 220% this year!

Congratulations to all who bought our EOS idea. We pushed it when EOS share price was around 1.3 Ausie dollars a year ago. It is 4.3 dollars today. Good move!

EOS announced today the historic first ever sale of 100 kW laser weapon. Nobody ever sold such a strong laser weapon. Historical achievement. The share price is 43% up today.

There is a lot of further catalysts this year. I would not be surprised if the share price would break 10 dollars this year.

EOS is holding webinar tomorrow:

https://investorhub.eos-aus.com/webinars/VyE13y-eos-secures-order-for-100kw-high-power-laser-weapon-system

EOS CEO on the laser deal – short video:

https://investorhub.eos-aus.com/activity-updates/eos-secures-order-for-100kw-high-power-laser-weapon-system-for-counter-drone-warfare

Do look at the original thesis

Several Ideas Generated Above 100% Return in 2025. What is Next?

Summary

  • Nebius Group remains our core AI play, with strong management and the potential for multi-year value creation.
  • Electro Optic Systems is poised for explosive growth, with major contracts expected to drive significant upside in 2025.
  • ShaMaran Petroleum offers a catalyst-driven opportunity; pipeline reopening could push the share price higher imminently as negotiations conclude.
  • Vicore Pharma is our top idea for 2026, with very material upside potential.
Money suck
PM Images

Our family office is experiencing one of its best years. It is mainly thanks to several stocks that I wrote about here on Seeking Alpha.

I would like to provide an update on the ideas I wrote for Seeking Alpha and update my positioning on those.

Nebius Group

Nebius Group N.V. (NASDAQ: NBIS) has been one of my top-performing ideas this year. I was one of the first to write about Nebius on Seeking Alpha in mid-November 2024. Since then, Nebius has returned almost 200%.

Nebius
Nebius (SeekingAlpha.com)

Following my initial article, I wrote four updates on Seeking Alpha on Nebius.

We have not sold any Nebius stock, and it has grown into the most prominent position in our family office. We bought Nebius at $10 OTC before it was listed. Today’s price is $53.

Nebius Investment Case

Nebius remains our core AI play. I believe AI is the biggest Megatrend since the internet and represents the most enormous value-creation opportunity of our lifetime.

It is very difficult to guess who the winners of the AI Megatrend will be. In my view, Nebius is one of the contenders.

The management team had already built a $30 billion business to abandon in favour of establishing Nebius. The management team has a strong track record of innovating around its core business – in Yandex they built the whole ecosystem around the core search engine business, that dominates the whole Russian-speaking world. They are already doing the same in Nebius. The company is transitioning from an AI data centre provider to an AI ecosystem provider. They are at the forefront of AI developments and are innovating in new areas where they have an opportunity to spot emerging trends early. That is why we are staying invested in Nebius.

Back-of-the-envelope peer valuation

Coreweave has a market capitalisation of $80 billion and an enterprise value of $97 billion. Goldman Sachs estimates CoreWeave’s 2025 revenues at $5 billion. This means that CoreWeave’s capital is trading at approximately 20 times its revenue.

Nebius’ current enterprise value is about $11 billion (assuming the company spent only $0.5 billion in Q2 and that the proceeds from the $1 billion debt issue remain unspent).

Coreweave
Market Capitalization$80 Billion
Net Debt$17 Billion
Enterprise Value$97 Billion
Goldman Sachs 2025 Revenue estimate$5 Billion
EV/Sales19.40
Nebius
Market Capitalization$12 Billion
Net Debt-$1 Billion
Subsidiaries and holdings$6 Billion
Enterprise value of the AI Datacenter Business$5 Billion
Nebius’s 2025 AI Data center Revenue Guidance$0.7 Billion
EV/Sales of AI Datacenter Business7.14

Source: our calculations

We have compiled the table above to illustrate Nebius’s undervaluation. Please note that the result is very indicative, as I deduct the full value of Nebius’s subsidiaries to calculate the enterprise value of Nebius’s AI Datacenter business. That approach would mean that the market gives Nebius full credit for the valuation of its subsidiaries. I am not sure if this is the case.

I wrote an article comparing Nebius vs CoreWeave. I concluded that Nebius is a much better company than CoreWeave. The table above indicates material upside for Nebius to catch up to CoreWeave multiples.

My base case is for Nebius to double this year, with the central thesis being the longer-term value creation. Nebius is one of those companies which you may look at in five or ten years and see how many times the company has multiplied your original investment. Similarly, people look at today’s internet success stories.

The main risks to the thesis are macro turbulence and slow AI innovations by Nebius. Macro disruption would only delay AI by making it more difficult for companies to access capital. I am comfortable with Nebius’s ability to innovate, given the strong track record of its management team and Nebius’s performance over the last year. The extraordinary value creation management achieved in the previous two years – Nebius’s Enterprise value of $13 billion is the best proof.

Other Investments and Ideas

Electro Optic Systems

Electro Optic Systems Holdings Limited (OTCPK:EOPSF) and (EOS:AUS) is an Australia-based company that is a world leader in shooting down drones using bullets and lasers. Their marketing slogan is:

Nobody kills drones like EOS”

I wrote an article on EOS in mid-March 2025. In three months, the idea generated a return of ~120%.

EOS
EOS (SeekingAlpha)

I believe we are in the early innings. My price target for the 2025 year-end is A$10, vs. the current share price of A$2.80.

The company has a $1.5 billion backlog of orders in negotiations. Surprisingly, despite the war, armies did not speed up their procurement processes. Despite that, I expect EOS to sign the first-ever contract for laser weapons against drones in the next few months. EOS will be the first company ever to sell such a strong laser weapon. The share price could easily double on the announcement.

There are multiple large contracts in finalisation for this year. I believe 2025 will be a very good year for EOS and its shareholders. And 2026 should be even better. Read the article for details and check their website for their excellent presentation and quarterly webcast.

The future for EOS is laser. They have been developing lasers for 40 years. The company claims it can shoot down a coin from Earth’s orbit with a laser. There is a very material value creation opportunity in EOS’s laser business.

The main risk is competition. EOS is two years ahead in the accuracy of its “bullet” anti-drone devices. The laser advance might be even stronger. The stock is currently so cheap because investors are still not fully confident in EOS’s ability to leverage its technological advantages into contracts. I believe that 2025 will be the turning point for EOS. The share price movement over the last two months indicates that many investors also believe this.

ShaMaran Petroleum

ShaMaran Petroleum Corp. (OTCPK:SHASF), (SNM:CA) is an independent oil and gas company that produces from two adjacent blocks in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. ShaMaran belongs to the Lunding family holdings.

ShaMaran is a play on the reopening of the Kurdistan-Turkey oil pipeline, which has been closed for the last two years due to local disputes. Now the Trump administration is pushing for the pipeline to reopen, which has the potential to double the ShaMaran Petroleum share price.

The negotiations are in the final stages as this article is written.

The meetings between the Iraqi government and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) will conclude today, with draft agreements set to be presented to the Iraqi Council of Ministers on Tuesday, paving the way for the resumption of oil exports and the disbursement of civil servant salaries in the Kurdistan Region, sources familiar with the matter told Zoom News on 6/30/2025

Since I wrote the ShaMaran article at the end of March, the stock has increased by 16%. I believe the catalyst could materialise at any time, which could potentially double the share price.

ShaMaran
ShaMaran (SeekingAlpha)

The investment case is based on a political resolution that is outside ShaMaran’s control. Further there are many additional risk issues related to the pipeline reopening – namely the payment terms, and repayment of overdue balances (ShaMaran is owed $80 million). An additional risk is a new geopolitical instability in the region.

Buy Vicore, Sell Pliant

I am very bullish on Vicore for 2026.

In the article In Therapeutics, I prefer Vicore Pharma over Pliant Therapeutics. I introduced Vicore Pharma (STO: VICO) and compared it to the US-listed Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. (PLRX).

The article’s point was that the US-listed Pliant was 12 times more expensive than Sweden-listed Vicore while having materially worse results. The article recommended buying Vicore and shorting Pliant.

The Pliant short thesis is playing well. The Pliant short generated a 96% return.

Long Vicore
Long Vicore Pharma (SeekingAlpha)

Vicore might be one of the most promising stocks in our portfolio for 2026.

IPF is not a curable disease at the moment. There were two drugs which sold more than $3.5 billion in 2021. Both drugs have incomparable results in comparison with Vicore. Both only delay the disease by weeks or a single month.

Vicore has the best results ever of any company in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). Nobody has ever achieved such results as Pliant showed in the 2b study. The 2a study results indicated that Vicore may make IPF a curable disease.

The $3.5 billion price tag represents a 20x multiple of Vicore’s current share price. That is if Vicore’s results would only delay the disease by weeks as the others did. If the 2a results were achieved again, Vicore might be able to gain an even higher valuation.

Some top US pharma investors are involved.

Nothing much will happen during 2025 with Vicore as the 2b study results are expected mid-next year. All eyes on 2026!

The major risk is that the 2b study results are materially worse than its 2a results. Vicore’s advantage is, that the bar is very low. As mentioned above the two drugs that sold for $3.5 billion in 2021 only achieved delay in the disease for weeks. For Vicore, a bad result would be to be on par with these. Not a bad upside.

Golar LNG

Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) builds, owns, and operates marine infrastructure for the liquefaction and regasification of LNG. It currently owns two out of nine existing FLNG ships in the world, which positions it perfectly for the projected LNG deficit in Europe.

We wrote the article in December 2023. Since then, the idea returned over 100%.

Golar
Golar LNG (SeekingAlpha)

We are out of Golar now. I do like the stock. I have traded it several times. Whenever there is a market pullback, we buy Golar and sell it around these levels. Whenever the opportunity arises, we will repeat the trade.

The primary risks are accidents, production disruptions, and fluctuations in LNG pricing. A sudden increase in LNG supply would decrease the market component of the payments.

Link Mobility

LINK Mobility Group Holding ASA (OTCPK: LMGHF) is Europe’s largest company in helping other companies and state institutions communicate with their customers through SMS, WhatsApp, Viber, Instagram, and other messaging platforms. If you fly and get a boarding SMS, it could be from LINK.

It is a solid company growing organically and through acquisitions. We wrote an article in late January 2024 when the share price was around 17 NOK. Today the share price is 28.6 NOK, generating around 60% return. We remain invested as the company keeps delivering.

The primary risks for Link Mobility are margin pressure and integration risks. The company has successfully integrated over 35 acquisitions. I consider the acquisition risk to be low. Most of the profits the company generates come from markets where it holds a dominant position. The fact that it is the largest European company gives it a competitive advantage of massive scale vs. its peers.

What is Next

I am now working for a company that has tremendous upside potential. Based in Sweden, annual revenue growth of 400%, no debt, highly profitable, cheap at 5 times EBIT, and almost no research coverage. I visited the company last week. I find it very attractive, and I’m already writing an article. Stay tuned.

Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Disclosure: 

The goal of the blog is to provide investment ideas for further research. I/we have a beneficial position in the shares discussed above either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. The article does not represent investment advice. Please do your own research before making any investment action.

Electro Optic Systems: A Global Force in Counter-Drone Defense

Summary

Electro Optic Systems (EOS), an Australian defense firm, is at the forefront of counter-drone technology. With a significant portion of its market capitalization held in cash and no debt, the company is poised for strong growth.

  • EOS boasts a robust A$2 billion contract pipeline, with key deals in advanced negotiations, each of which could substantially enhance its valuation.
  • The company’s cutting-edge solutions, including the Slinger and R500, offer unparalleled precision in neutralizing drones, positioning EOS as a crucial player in modern military technology.
  • With solid financials and a promising contract outlook, EOS presents a compelling investment opportunity with high upside potential and relatively limited downside risk.

The Drone Defense Leader

Electro Optic Systems (OTCPK:EOPSF) (EOS:AUS), based in Australia, specializes in counter-drone technology using both bullets and lasers. The company promotes itself with the slogan:

“Nobody kills drones like EOS”

Listed on the Australian Stock Exchange, EOS has a market capitalization of A$240 million and a pro forma cash balance of A$178 million with zero debt. This means that 75% of its market capitalization is in cash, resulting in an enterprise value of just A$62 million.

The company stands to gain from geopolitical instability and evolving warfare tactics. Drones have become a dominant tool in modern conflicts, and EOS is positioned to capitalize on this shift.

Advanced Hard-Kill Technology

EOS has developed some of the most precise “hard-kill” systems available, capable of eliminating drones using bullets or lasers. The company claims to offer the most accurate drone neutralization solutions in the market today.

  • Future is Laser: EOS has developed laser technology capable of shooting down objects the size of a coin from orbit. Its laser-based counter-drone systems are already commercially available.
  • Europe’s Military Spending Surge: The war in Ukraine has driven record-high defense investments across Europe, positioning EOS to benefit significantly.

Drones Reshape Warfare

Russia’s War on Ukraine has underscored the effectiveness of drones in combat. The increasing use of drones has fundamentally altered the battlefield:

“For just $1,000, you can deploy a drone to attack assets worth $10 million, $100 million, or even $1 billion. High-value targets no longer require massive expenditures.”
— Clive Cuthell, EOS COO

The use of drones has skyrocketed. For example, in the latter half of 2024, Russia quadrupled its drone attacks against Ukraine, launching 1,400 drone strikes in October alone.

Counter-Drone Defense: The Cost Problem

“An enemy can launch hundreds or even thousands of drones at once. Dealing with such saturation is extremely difficult.”
— Clive Cuthell, EOS COO

This swarm strategy was demonstrated in Iran’s 2024 drone attack on Israel, highlighting the cost imbalance of counter-drone warfare. Many nations, including Ukraine, initially had no choice but to use $100,000 missiles to shoot down $1,000 drones—an unsustainable defense model.

The only practical solution is cost-effective drone defense, and bullet-based countermeasures are the most efficient. EOS has established itself as the global leader in “hard-kill” anti-drone systems.

EOS: A Deep Dive

Originally founded as a government research institute focused on optics and laser technology, EOS became a private company in 1983 and has been publicly traded since 2000.

Today, the company operates in almost 20 countries, with manufacturing facilities in the US, UAE, and Australia, and a newly established laser innovation center in Singapore. With a global workforce of 350 employees, EOS continues its European expansion in 2025.

Key Leadership:

  • Dr. Andreas Schwer, CEO since July 2022, formerly led Rheinmetall Defense and worked at Airbus and Manitowoc.
  • Previously, Dr. Schwer spent three years advising Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on the country’s defense industry development.

Under his leadership, EOS streamlined operations, divested non-core assets, and launched new products. The last of these asset sales, EM Solutions, yielded A$158 million, representing a profit of A$132 million, over 50% of EOS’s market cap.

With a net cash position of A$128 million as of January 2025, EOS expects its cash balance to rise to A$178 million, representing 75% of its market capitalization—funding its A$2 billion contract pipeline.

Unmatched Drone Defense Capabilities

EOS’s core products include:

  • Remote Weapon Systems (RWS) – including the newly launched R500 AI-driven system.
  • High-energy laser weaponsfirst-ever commercial sales secured in 2024.
  • Space warfare technologies – laser tracking and satellite disruption capabilities.

Key Differentiator:

  • Superior accuracy – In recent tests, EOS systems shot down 100% of drones, while the second-best competitor achieved only 75%.
  • AI-Driven “Iron Dome” System – EOS’s R500 RWS can autonomously coordinate drone defense without human intervention.

EOS in Ukraine

  • EOS has over 190 Remote Weapon Systems deployed in Ukraine.
  • A new A$181 million contract is under negotiation.

Financial Performance & Growth Outlook

  • 2024 Revenue: A$259 million (+17% YoY)
  • Gross Margins: 46%
  • EBITDA: A$13 million
  • 2025 Revenue Guidance: A$160 million (flat YoY), with additional contracts in progress

A$2 Billion Contract Pipeline

EOS’s contract backlog as of December 2024 was A$136 million. The company has never lost a contract bid, and its A$2 billion pipeline includes:

  • UAE R500 contract (~A$500 million) – EOS’s largest contract ever, expected in 2025.
  • EU NATO laser weapon contract (A$50-100 million)first commercial laser weapon deal.
  • Hanwha RWS contract (A$100 million) – conclusion expected in early 2025.
  • Ukraine RWS contract (A$181 million) – pending financing approval.

Valuation & Investment Thesis

EOS trades at a 0.4x EV/order book, compared to industry peers at 1.0x. If EOS secures its A$500 million contract and the multiple rises to 0.6x, the Enterprise Value would jump to A$380 million, implying a market cap of A$550 million—130% above current levels.

Price Target for 2025: A$4-5 per share, compared to the current A$1.25 per share.

Conclusion

Modern warfare is defined by drones, and EOS is the best at eliminating them. With a record A$2 billion contract pipeline, a debt-free balance sheet, and cash covering 75% of its market cap, the risk-reward balance is highly favorable.

With upcoming contract announcements, EOS has the potential for major upside revaluation. The future of warfare lies in lasers and space, and EOS is leading the charge.

LInk to latest investor presentation

https://investorhub.eos-aus.com/investor-presentations

Link to SeekingAlpha article:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4768153-electro-optic-systems-the-global-leader-in-drone-defense

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Disclosure: 

The goal of the blog is to provide investment ideas for further research. I/we have a beneficial position in the shares discussed above either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. The article does not represent investment advice. Please do your own research before making any investment action.